1

Attach Id ( 5729 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 5731

1

Attach Id ( 5783 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 5789

1

Attach Id ( 6030 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6033

1

Attach Id ( 6167 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6171

1

Attach Id ( 6201 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6205

1

Attach Id ( 6248 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6251

1

Attach Id ( 6371 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6377

1

Attach Id ( 6618 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 6620

1

Attach Id ( 7060 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 7065

1

Attach Id ( 7305 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 7309

1

Attach Id ( 7821 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 7825

1

Attach Id ( 7926 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 7929

1

Attach Id ( 9785 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 9787

1

Attach Id ( 9829 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 9838

1

Attach Id ( 9906 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 9911

1

Attach Id ( 9960 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 9971

1

Attach Id ( 10028 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10031

1

Attach Id ( 10108 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10114

1

Attach Id ( 10272 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10276

1

Attach Id ( 10281 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10283

1

Attach Id ( 10296 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10299

1

Attach Id ( 10309 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10313

1

Attach Id ( 10362 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10365

1

Attach Id ( 10401 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10408

1

Attach Id ( 10595 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10603

1

Attach Id ( 10659 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10415

1

Attach Id ( 10658 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10415

1

Attach Id ( 10668 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10672

1

Attach Id ( 10669 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 10673

1

Attach Id ( 11089 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 11091

1

Attach Id ( 11855 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 11857

1

Attach Id ( 12852 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12863

1

Attach Id ( 12881 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12890

1

Attach Id ( 12904 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12913

1

Attach Id ( 12922 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12928

1

Attach Id ( 12947 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12955

1

Attach Id ( 12964 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 12970

1

Attach Id ( 13510 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 13513

1

Attach Id ( 13520 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 13525

1

Attach Id ( 13865 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 13872

1

Attach Id ( 13894 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 13898

1

Attach Id ( 13974 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 13976

1

Attach Id ( 14430 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 14434

1

Attach Id ( 14449 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 14455

1

Attach Id ( 14943 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 14949

1

Attach Id ( 15132 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15134

1

Attach Id ( 15142 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15144

1

Attach Id ( 15152 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15154

1

Attach Id ( 15185 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15186

1

Attach Id ( 15197 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15198

1

Attach Id ( 15211 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15212

1

Attach Id ( 15215 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15099

1

Attach Id ( 15272 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15252

1

Attach Id ( 15275 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15106

1

Attach Id ( 15329 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15289

1

Attach Id ( 15331 ) not integer for post_thumbnail 15295

December | 2013 | DML Commons

Archive | December, 2013

Grammar and the ESL Writing Class

Kroll, B. Exploring the dynamics of second language writingFrodesden, J. and Holten, C. (2003). Grammar and the ESL Writing Class. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 141-161). New York: Cambridge University Press.


Frodesden and Holten begin with a brief discussion of the construct of “good writing” and then consider the impact of communicative language teaching methodologies on ESL grammar instruction in the 1980s. The authors begin by asking three questions:

  • Is formal grammar instruction useful for L2 (second language) writers?
  • What is the role of grammar in the drafting process?
  • Is individualized feedback on errors in student writing an effective strategy for improving accuracy and developing overall language proficiency?

Three Questions

To answer each of these questions, the authors give a short review of relevant literature published in the 70s and 80s. Major themes covered are a) the dichotomy between theoretical and pedagogical grammar, b) conceptual constructions of error and c) the degree of focus given to form and to function.  They review criticisms of direct grammar instruction attributed to Krashen and Hartwell and others who suggest that formal grammar instruction has a negligible, or even harmful a effect on writers’ emerging composition skills. They point out that these positions were developed within the context of L1 (first language) instruction, and may not be appropriate to L2 (second language) learners, for whom “focused attention to language features is often beneficial and sometimes necessary” (p. 114).

Turning to drafting, Frodesden and Holten suggest that the dominant view of writing as a recursive process unfolding over multiple drafts means that less attention is now given to accuracy. Process writing, they say,  gives a lot of attention the organization of content and often delays editing to final draft stages. They mention that this practice is supported by research indicating that ‘more effective writers’ – in both L1 and L2 instruction – often delay editing until they are at the final draft stage. Frodesden and Holten then say that L2 writers – especially those who are less proficient – do benefit from feedback on both grammar and content throughout the writing process and state that weaker students who do not receive such feedback often produce final drafts replete with errors which they are unable to correct precisely because they lack the formal grammatical knowledge needed to do so.

The authors conclude with a discussion of whether individual feedback on errors contributes to language proficiency. They refer to Truscott’s 1996 paper in which he asserted that “Grammar correction has no place in writing classes and should be abandoned” (p. 361) and explain that this position is based on both theoretical and empirical evidence. They then review a rebuttal of this position by Ferris and Roberts, who claim that empirical evidence – including some from their own studies – shows that students who receive direct grammar feedback are better able to self-edit than are those who received no direct feedback on grammar errors. They point out that explicit grammar instruction and correction

help students notice grammatical forms, focus explicitly on the gap between their output and what native speakers would write, and expose them to language forms that they may not be ready to acquire immediately, but will at some point in their acquisition trajectory, (p. 147).

Frodesden and Holten conclude by mentioning three potential benefits of explicit error correction: 1) students gain an understanding of how their texts deviate from conventions of standard written English; 2) develop self-editing skills; 3) gain understanding of the importance of clarity and appropriateness of written forms.